What is that saying about the best-laid plans?
Planning is one thing, but on its own is really pretty ineffective.
If you think about it, I can plan to take a nice holiday but unless I get on the plane, the holiday won’t happen.
I can plan to lose weight or get fit but unless I eat better and start exercising then the chances of achieving the aim are zero.
Once I have a plan, I also need to figure out a way to implement it.
Your business is no different.

I’m often talking about the importance of planning and how a fail to plan is a plan to fail.
Business planning is one of the most significant contributions you can make to your business.
As you see though it is really only half the picture, half the story.
Once you have the plan, you need to develop a way to implement it.
There are a couple of ways of looking at this.
I always find the implementation phase exciting.
It is where I get to see how the plans I have made, either in my own business or for a client, can work to achieve the stated goals.
The difficulty is that many of us see the implementation phase as the difficult part.
It is true that many businesses fail to plan at all but a good number of those that do plan, fall down in the implementation phase.
Don’t think that is limited to micro or small business either.
I’ve worked with some larger businesses which have spent large amounts of money developing strategic growth plans only to have them gather dust on the shelf.
Having the planning completed can be exciting as it gives the business owner a chance to dream, to determine exactly what they want from their business and to really explore opportunities and possibilities.
When it comes to then implementing the plan, many business owners suffer a real blockage.
This may be because the thought of implementing the plan becomes overwhelming or it may simply be that the planning process has taken all the time and energy they have at that time for working on their business.
Either way, the outcome is the same.
One way I have found of moving past that blockage is to look at the implementation as a reward for the planning.
In that way, you can view the implementation from an entirely positive perspective.
It is a simple psychological concept that how we view a task will impact our ability to start it, let alone finish it.
If we look at a task as a burden then our effectiveness will be dramatically limited.
By viewing the implementation as a reward, we can put a positive spin and attend to the challenge accordingly.
The other important factor is to break the implementation down into manageable pieces.
Take your plan, whether it is a strategic business plan, a particular growth strategy or a plan for a particular project in your business, break it into stages and then determine the steps you need to take in order to achieve each stage.
In this way, you will have developed an implementation strategy that puts your hard-earned plan into action.
Here are 2 ways we can help you:
That’s essentially what Australia is doing by ramping up migration while failing to plan for the housing and infrastructure to support it.
The conversation around our housing crisis is often framed around interest rates, investors, or planning delays.
But there’s a critical dimension we keep avoiding: Australia’s housing and migration policies are completely out of sync, and this is causing systemic damage.
Over the last few years, we’ve been experiencing the fastest population growth in modern history, yet we’re failing to build enough homes, in part because our policies are pulling in opposite directions.
The federal government is stepping on the accelerator with migration, while state and local governments are fumbling with the brakes on housing supply.
And the result is whiplash for everyone trying to navigate the property market with a critical shortage of homes, soaring rents, a generation locked out of ownership, and property investors left navigating chaos.
Let me be clear: migration isn’t really the problem. Poor planning is.
I believe we need to keep migration levels up to help maintain a large pool of employed tax-paying workers who grease the wheels of our economy and replace the retiring baby boomers and the many millennials taking time out of the workforce to have babies.
But unless we bring housing and migration policy into alignment, things are only going to get worse.

Net overseas migration was 446,000 in 2023-24.
Sure, that’s less than the staggering numbers of the year before, but it’s virtually the entire population of Canberra in just one year.

Now consider this: over the same period, dwellings approved and commenced fell below 2019-20 levels; approvals were 6.4% lower at 163,279 dwellings, and commencements were 8.2% lower at 158,690 dwellings.
These are the lowest totals seen since 2011-12, which were 149,889 and 145,350 dwellings respectively.
Here’s how that mismatch looks visually:

The heart of the issue is structural.
The federal government controls migration policy, while state and local governments oversee housing supply through planning laws, land release, and infrastructure development.
So, while Canberra opens the floodgates to boost GDP, fill job shortages, and drive long-term population growth, which I believe are all valid goals, they’re not the ones responsible for ensuring there are enough homes or schools or roads.
That responsibility falls to the states, which are often under-resourced, politically constrained, or flat-out behind on planning and delivery.
The problem is that these systems rarely talk to each other.
Migration targets are set without any coordinated plan for the homes, roads, schools, and services that new residents will need.
Worse still, housing policy is often reactive — councils block development to appease voters, planning systems are outdated, and infrastructure funding lags behind growth corridors.
It’s like having one hand planting seeds for a bumper crop and the other hand forgetting to water them.
Eventually, something breaks, and we’re all paying the price.
But renters are feeling it first, with vacancy rates in most capitals near record lows (under 1% in many areas), and rents have been rising at double-digit annual rates.
And of course, first homebuyers are being priced out — again.
When housing affordability deteriorates, it’s tempting to blame the newcomers.
We’re already seeing this in the media — headlines suggesting migration is the root cause of the crisis.
But that narrative is both misleading and dangerous.
Migrants aren’t causing the housing shortage. Policy failures are.
In fact, migrants are more likely to live in shared housing or rent in high-density areas.
They’re also net contributors to the economy.
The real problem is that we’re growing the population without growing the infrastructure and housing to match.
Governments have failed to anticipate demand, streamline development approvals, invest in infrastructure, or incentivise the right types of housing in the right places.
Instead, we get knee-jerk policies – talk about rent freezes, investor scapegoating, and populist zoning restrictions that only make things worse.
But the shortfall in housing supply isn’t just a failure of policy alignment — there are also significant economic and financial headwinds making it extremely difficult to get new homes off the ground.
In recent years, the cost of construction has surged dramatically.
Building materials have seen double-digit price hikes due to global supply chain disruptions, labour shortages, and local regulatory bottlenecks.
Builders are paying more for tradies, insurances, and compliance, while delays from planning approvals and red tape only make projects riskier and more expensive.
And construction timeframes to build a new house have extended from 6.5 months pre-pandemic to over 10 months today, and of course, it can take years to build an apartment building.
At the same time, rising interest rates have blown out development finance costs, making it harder for developers to secure funding, especially for medium- and high-density projects where pre-sales are sluggish due to affordability constraints.

Many builders are simply walking away from proposed developments because the numbers don’t stack up — even if there’s strong demand, they can’t build at a loss.
As a result, we’re seeing a wave of project delays, cancellations, and builder insolvencies.
The pipeline of future housing stock is shrinking just when we need it to expand.
And ironically, this means even though we have a housing shortage, the market isn't responding in the way basic supply-demand economics would suggest — because the fundamentals of feasibility have broken down.
If we treated housing and migration as two halves of the same puzzle, here’s what would change:
If we’re going to bring in around 400,000 people a year, we need a plan to build around 160,000+ homes a year at a minimum.
Not just vague goals, but enforceable housing targets for each state and region, tied directly to migration intake numbers.
Housing policy isn’t just about roofs over heads — it’s about schools, roads, transport, and hospitals.
Migration policy should trigger infrastructure funding to ensure new communities are supported, not stressed.
State governments must streamline approval processes, especially for higher-density housing in inner- and middle-ring suburbs where demand is highest.
If the people are coming, the homes need to be ready, and fast.
We don’t just need more homes — we need the right homes.
That means family-friendly apartments, townhouses near jobs and transport, and more rental stock.
Migration data should inform what gets built and where.
We already have a National Housing Accord — but it’s toothless.
What we need is an agreement that holds each level of government accountable, backed by incentives and penalties.
This isn’t a nice-to-have; it’s critical to national prosperity.
If we keep separating migration and housing policy, we’re not just setting up more housing pain — we’re risking:
In other words, this is a national prosperity issue, not just a property market problem.
Australia’s housing crisis isn’t going to fix itself.
It’s a structural issue, made worse by misaligned policies and short-term thinking.
Australia’s migration program is essential. It brings in talent, rejuvenates our ageing population, and drives long-term economic growth.
But we must stop pretending we can grow the population without growing the places people live.
That approach is unsustainable, unfair, and ultimately self-defeating.
It’s time our policymakers realised that housing policy is migration policy, and treated it with the seriousness it deserves.
Otherwise, we’ll keep just growing our population without growing the places they can live — and we’ll all pay the price.
]]>This weekend's auction results around Australia:
| Capital City | Auctions (This Week) | Rate (This Week) | Auctions (Last Week) | Rate (Last Week) | Auctions (Same Week Last Year) | Rate (Same Week Last Year) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sydney | 754 | 74.7% | 667 | 73.6% | 764 | 73.3% |
| Melbourne | 1184 | 72.1% | 849 | 74.1% | 1051 | 64.5% |
| Brisbane | 179 | 43.3% | 124 | 46.7% | 137 | 58.7% |
| Adelaide | 155 | 64.6% | 146 | 57.5% | 167 | 75.2% |
| Canberra | 113 | 62.9% | 73 | 52.8% | 88 | 66.6% |
Source: My Housing Market
The national weekend auction market reported an average clearance rate of 63.5% over the past week which was higher than the 60.9% reported over the previous week but lower than the 67.7% reported over the same week last year.

Housing market activity can be expected to rise through the remainder of May and into June with improved affordability and rising confidence generated by yet another cut in official interest rates.
Note: Sydney clearance rate rises again.
The robust Sydney auction market reported yet another rise in the auction clearance clearance rate over the past week despite a notable rise in auction numbers.

Sydney recorded a clearance rate of 74.7% over the past week which was again higher than the 73.6% recorded over the previous week and higher than the 73.3% reported over the same week last year.
Auction numbers were significantly higher over the past week with 754 listed versus the 667 auctioned over the previous week but just below the 764 reported over the same week last year.
Sydney recorded a median price of $1,920,000 for houses sold at auction over the past week which was higher than the $1,917,500 recorded over the previous week and 6.7% higher than the $1,800,000 reported over the same week last year.
The Lower North again recorded the highest regional clearance rate over the past week at 93.1% followed again by the Inner West at 81.5% and the Upper North Shore at 75.7%. The Central Coast again reported the lowest clearance rate at 37.5%.
The clearance rate for houses was 73.8% with units higher again this week at 76.3%.
Sydney Regions Auction Results, Saturday, May 24th 2025:
| Region | Results | Clearance Rate | Median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Canterbury Bankstown | 30 | 66.7% | $1,485,000 |
| Central Coast | 8 | 37.5% | $1,025,000 |
| City and East | 97 | 74.2% | $1,700,500 |
| Inner West | 119 | 81.5% | $1,912,500 |
| Lower North | 58 | 93.1% | $1,820,000 |
| North West | 34 | 70.6% | $2,040,000 |
| Northern Beaches | 33 | 72.7% | $1,601,000 |
| South | 79 | 74.1% | $1,612,500 |
| South West | 29 | 62.1% | $1,220,000 |
| Upper North Shore | 70 | 75.7% | $1,745,000 |
| West | 63 | 57.1% | $1,213,500 |
| Houses | 420 | 73.8% | $1,920,000 |
| Units | 186 | 76.3% | $1,040,000 |
| Total | 606 | 74.7% | $1,601,000 |
Source: My Housing Market
The top reported Sydney home reported sold over the past week was a 3-unit house at 17/8-10 Billyard Av Elizabeth Bay that sold for $6,450,000.
The most affordable home reported sold at auction in Sydney over the past week was a 1-bedroom unit at 25/51 Glenview St Paddington that sold for $479,000.
Top Sydney Sales, Saturday, May 24th 2025:
| Address | Price | Agent |
|---|---|---|
| 17/8-10 Billyard Av Elizabeth Bay | $6,450,000 | Ray White Woollahra |
| 102 Barker Rd Strathfield | $6,400,000 | McGrath Strathfield |
| 5 Harden Av Northbridge | $6,100,000 | Ray White Lower North Shore |
| 8 Abernethy St Seaforth | $5,510,000 | Clarke & Humel Property |
| 4/55A Prince Albert St Mosman | $5,300,000 | BresicWhitney Lower North |
| 23 Davidson Av Concord | $5,225,000 | DibChidiac&Co. |
| 50 The Point Rd Hunters Hill | $5,200,000 | McGrath Hunters Hill |
| 397 Glebe Point Rd Glebe | $4,640,000 | Belle Property Glebe |
| 34a Bayview Rd Canada Bay | $4,500,000 | McGrath Strathfield |
| 55-57 Goodrich Rd Cecil Park | $4,450,000 | Davids Estate Agents |
Source: My Housing Market
Note: Another positive result for resurgent Melbourne market.
Melbourne’s recorded yet another relatively strong auction clearance rate over the past week with signs continuing of a sustained revival in the local market.
Melbourne recorded a clearance rate of 72.1% over the past week which was lower than the 74.1% recorded over the previous week but again well ahead of the 64.5% reported over the same week last year.

1184 homes were reported listed for auction over the past week which was higher than the 849 auctioned over the previous week and higher than the 1051 reported over the same week last year.
Melbourne recorded a median price of $1,085,000 for houses sold at auction over the past week which was higher than the $997,550 reported over the previous week but 1.4% lower than the $1,100,500 reported over the same week last year.
Melbourne’s Outer East reported the top regional clearance rate over the past week with 77.9% followed by the North at 74.5% and the Inner South at 74.2%. The Inner City recorded the lowest regional rate at 64.0%.
The clearance rate for houses was 72.1% with units similar this week at 72.2%.
Melbourne Regions Auction Results, Saturday, May 24th 2025:
| Region | Results | Clearance Rate | Median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Inner East | 140 | 71.4% | $1,462,000 |
| Inner South | 128 | 74.2% | $1,317,500 |
| Inner Urban | 100 | 64.0% | $913,000 |
| North East | 108 | 69.4% | $825,000 |
| Northern | 94 | 74.5% | $793,300 |
| Outer East | 104 | 77.9% | $1,294,250 |
| South East | 45 | 71.1% | $800,000 |
| West | 148 | 73.0% | $860,000 |
| Houses | 723 | 72.1% | $1,085,000 |
| Units | 144 | 72.2% | $720,000 |
| Total | 867 | 72.1% | $992,000 |
Source: My Housing Market
Melbourne’s top reported auction sale over the week was a 5-bedroom house at 20 Carson St Kew that sold for $4,200,000.
The most affordable home reported sold at auction in Melbourne over the week was a 1-bedroom unit at 6/45 Woolton Av Thornbury that sold for $350,000.
Top Melbourne Sales, Saturday, May 24th 2025:
| Address | Price | Agent |
|---|---|---|
| 20 Carson St Kew | $4,200,000 | Kay & Burton Boroondara |
| 1 Vincent St Glen Iris | $4,060,000 | Marshall White Stonnington |
| 5 Hakea Ct Mount Waverley | $3,708,000 | Jellis Craig Mount Waverley |
| 23 Margarita St Hampton | $3,705,000 | Marshall White |
| 282 Union Rd Balwyn | $3,211,800 | HEAVYSIDE - Boroondara |
| 31 Wallis Av Ivanhoe East | $2,825,000 | Miles Real Estate Ivanhoe |
| 34 Braemar St Essendon | $2,650,000 | Woodards Essendon |
| 3 Head St Strathmore | $2,560,000 | Jellis Craig Moonee Valley |
| 43 Dillon Gr Glen Iris | $2,551,000 | Shelter Real Estate |
| 14 May St Fitzroy North | $2,500,000 | Jellis Craig Fitzroy |
Source: My Housing Market
Top Brisbane Sales, Saturday, May 24th 2025:
| Address | Price | Agent |
|---|---|---|
| 36 Lindon St Dutton Park | $4,500,000 | Ray White New Farm |
| 61 Dunrod St Holland Park West | $4,200,000 | Place Estate Agents New Farm |
| 57 Herbert St Paddington | $3,200,000 | Ray White New Farm |
| 21005/33 Manning St South Brisbane | $2,300,000 | Ray White West End |
| 4 Pictum Pl Sunnybank | $1,850,000 | LJ Hooker Property Partners |
| 7 Catania St Wishart | $1,731,000 | LJ Hooker Property Partners |
| 276 Hawken Dr St Lucia | $1,720,000 | Place |
| 11 Oatland Cr Holland Park West | $1,575,000 | Ray White AKG |
| 28 Young Pl Runcorn | $1,501,000 | Ray White Rochedale |
| 304/15 Wharf St Hamilton | $1,440,000 | Ray White |
Source: My Housing Market
Top Adelaide Sales, Saturday, May 24th 2025:
| Address | Price | Agent |
|---|---|---|
| 76 Devereux Rd Beaumont | $2,255,000 | Klemich Real Estate |
| 6 East Tce Beaumont | $1,690,000 | Ray White Burnside |
| 42 Roebuck St Mile End | $1,561,000 | LJ Hooker Adelaide Metro |
| 3 Carolyn Av Fulham | $1,550,000 | Harris Real Estate - Glenelg |
| 24 Milton Av Fullarton | $1,405,000 | Ray White |
| 3 Grace Av Tranmere | $1,371,000 | Harris Real Estate - Kent Town |
| 13 Kapoola Av Felixstow | $1,350,000 | Ray White Norwood |
| 52 Tozer Rd Waterloo Corner | $1,330,000 | Ray White Salisbury |
| 6 Cooper Av Croydon Park | $1,300,000 | Crawford Doran |
| 25 Stevenson St Nailsworth | $1,257,000 | Scott Murphy Real Estate |
Source: My Housing Market
Top Canberra Sales, Saturday, May 24th 2025:
| Address | Price | Agent |
|---|---|---|
| 44 Phyllis Frost St Forde | $2,335,000 | home.byholly |
| 132 Carnegie Cr Griffith | $2,250,000 | Luton Properties - Manuka |
| 30 Spigl St Kaleen | $1,400,000 | Blackshaw Manuka |
| 153 Blamey Cr Campbell | $1,310,000 | Luton Properties - Manuka |
| 3 Zelman Pl Melba | $1,300,000 | Blackshaw Belconnen |
| 29/53 Eyre St Kingston | $1,255,000 | PURNELL |
| 2 Hazelton St Macgregor | $1,230,000 | Ray White Canberra |
| 31 Ryan St Curtin | $1,212,500 | home.byholly |
| 5 Nepean Pl Macquarie | $1,210,000 | Blackshaw Belconnen |
| 45 Bronhill St Moncrieff | $1,150,000 | MARQ Property |
Source: My Housing Market
But when you look past the headlines and dig into the data, a very different picture emerges.
According to the 2024 PIPA Annual Investor Sentiment Survey, nearly two-thirds (65%) of property investors are currently experiencing negative cash flow
This is a substantial jump from 57% in 2023.
And let’s be clear, this isn’t a one-off blip.
Many of these investors expect the situation to continue for years to come.

Here's how it breaks down:
67% of investors who own one property are in negative cash flow
72% of those with two properties are feeling the squeeze
66% of those with three properties are in the same boat with negative cash flow
And it's not just a temporary setback.
A significant portion of investors believe they'll be stuck with negative cash flow for five years or more, with some forecasting 10 to 20 years before they break even.
This isn’t surprising when you consider the environment we’re in.
Yes, rents have risen but they haven’t kept up with interest rates and skyrocketing holding costs like insurance, rates, land tax, etc.
Despite the narrative in some corners that investors are cashing in on the rental crisis, this data highlights a harsh truth: many investors are dipping into their own pockets just to keep their heads above water.
PIPA Chair Nicola McDougall rightly pointed out that this is not an ideal scenario.
In fact, over 40% of investors surveyed said their cash flows were “tight”, and another 11% were already dipping into savings to cover the shortfall.
And what’s driving investors to the edge?
Interest rates remain stubbornly high
Insurance, council rates, and maintenance costs have surged
Depreciation benefits and tax offsets can only do so much when you’re topping up the mortgage every month.
Here’s something worth remembering: 71% of property investors only own one property.
Another 18% own just two.
These investors aren’t property moguls. They’re everyday Australians trying to secure their financial future and take pressure off the pension system.
Yet these same investors are often demonised in the media or targeted with ill-conceived policies like changes to negative gearing or additional land taxes.
And that’s the danger.
When governments or commentators suggest further penalising this group, it could have a ripple effect on rental supply because many investors are already on the brink of selling up.
In fact, 57% of those considering selling say it’s due to rising holding costs.
At Metropole, we’ve always said property investment is a long-term game, but it must be strategic.
Negative gearing can be a valid short-term tactic if it's part of a well-thought-out wealth creation plan, especially when investing in high-growth locations.
But it’s not a sustainable strategy on its own.
Here are three things smart investors should be doing right now:
Review and renegotiate loans – Don’t just accept the bank’s default rate. Many investors are sitting on variable loans with interest rates that are 0.5% to 1% higher than necessary.
Reassess portfolio performance – Not every property in your portfolio will be a winner. Consider whether it's time to rebalance—especially if you're carrying underperforming assets.
Get professional advice – Now more than ever, investors need clarity, strategy, and support. This is not the time for DIY property investment.
The latest PIPA findings should serve as a wake-up call not just for investors, but for policymakers too.
We’re in a period of recalibration. Investors are adapting to a new reality where holding costs outpace rental growth.
But as always, those with a clear plan, realistic expectations, and access to the right advice will not only weather this storm but come out stronger on the other side.
After all, property investment has never been about getting rich quickly, it’s about building long-term, sustainable wealth.
]]>When I look at people around me who are ultra-successful — I mean, whether it’s in their business, their investments, with money, or in their physical health or maybe it’s in their relationships —it’s not that they’re any smarter.

It’s not that they’re any more talented.
They weren’t born with something special.
Instead, they simply have a different mindset.
They think differently and you’ve heard me say it before – your thoughts lead to your feelings; your feelings lead to your actions and your actions lead to your results.
For these successful people, their outside world – the results you see - is a reflection of their inside world – the way they think.
So here are five ways you can think differently to help make you more successful.
I remember reading about this way of thinking in Robert Kiyosaki’s book Rich Dad, Poor Dad when he said that poor people tend to say, “I can’t afford it” while rich people ask: “How do I afford it?”
Now here’s a good example of that…
Currently, many people are saying, “I can’t afford to get into the property market – it’s too expensive.”
Yet a small group of people is asking a better question “How can I get into the property market?” and by doing that they spend less than they earn, save a deposit, educate themselves to become financially fluent and take action.
In what areas of your life are you thinking: “I can’t.”
Now, you should be thinking: “How can I?”
In Star Wars Yoda famously said: “Do. Or do not. There is no try.”
Let me ask you a question...
Have you ever said:
I want to become financially disciplined.
I want to invest in property.
or maybe
I want to lose weight.
There is a massive difference between desire and commitment.
And that’s why if you want to become successful, an important mindset shift is moving from “I want to do it” to “I will do it.”
You know what it’s like…you want to do things but then find that you don’t actually do them.
Whether it’s doing daily exercise, losing weight, or being disciplined with your money.
I’ve found it interesting that many of us are so disciplined in some areas of our lives such as diet and exercise, yet so poorly disciplined in other areas of our life such as money management.
So how do you get to do things rather than just want to do things?
The answer is not just to convince the logical side of your mind that you’re going to do something, but you also need to work on the unconscious part of your mind - your emotional side.
And the best way to do that: figure out your “why?”
Why is it you want to do whatever you’re doing?
Why do you want to lose weight? Once you’ve had your heart attack and your doctor tells you got no choice it’s funny how you suddenly go on your daily walks, eat better and get fitter.
Similarly, why do you want to invest in property? Work on your why.
Is it more choices in life? Is it financial freedom for you and your family?
The stronger your why the more likely you are going to move from “I want to” to “I will do.”
There is no such thing as a victim.
Yet when things go wrong, most people love to say, “It’s not my fault.”
You know… it is it’s never their fault.
They blame their parents, their education, the boss, the banks, and the government.
In contrast, successful people take responsibility.
Fact is: it doesn’t matter whose fault something is; successful people take ownership and responsibility for everything in their life.
So from now on no more of this, “Well, it’s not my fault that this happened.”
Instead, start thinking “It’s my responsibility. I don’t care why it happened, but I’m going to make sure it doesn’t happen again.”
A lot of people think that rich people are just lucky.
Successful people are lucky.
Great athletes are lucky.

But talk to any of those rich people, those successful people, or the great athletes and you’ll find out its not luck.
Sure we occasionally get random good luck or bad luck, like winning the lottery or receiving an inheritance.
But no one has control over random good luck and random bad luck.
However, rich and successful people manufacture their own luck – they’re in the business of creating luck.
They do certain things every day that create the opportunity for good luck to occur in their lives.
We call these things Rich Habits and they are the focus of my international best-selling book that I’ve written with Tom Corley – Rich Habits, Poor Habits.
These Rich Habits are various habits that these successful people either learned from a parent, a mentor or through the school of hard knocks.

On the other hand, the average person does certain things that manifest into bad luck.
We call these things Poor Habits.
But let me make one thing clear… you’ve already won the lottery if you’re reading this blog.
You’ve won the genetic lottery by being born at the best time in history and you’re probably reading this in a country where you have freedoms that most people would “die for.”
Now I’m sure you’ve heard the expression:
“The harder I work, the luckier I get.”
Luck happens all the time.
It happens to everybody.
But people who are prepared for it, recognise it, and are prepared to take advantage of the luck, they’re the ones who actually get to reap the benefits of that lucky situation.
The bottom line is if you want more luck in your life, prepare for it by developing good habits, working hard, and being optimistic.
A lot of people think that everything in their life just happened by accident.

On the other hand, successful people realise that nothing happens.
They understand the principle of cause and effect.
They realise they are creating their future every day by the things that they do today.
Just like you have created what’s happening to you today by things you did quite some time ago.
For example, you are reading this blog today because a while ago you were interested in more success or money or property investment and you subscribed to my blog.
Or your state of health today is a result of your good or bad eating habits and your exercise or lack of exercise that occurred over the last months and years.
Or your financial state is a result of your money habits, your level of delayed gratification, and your investment decisions that were made a long time ago.

That’s right…everything in the world is a result of something else that made it happen – I mentioned before – the principle of cause and effect.
Everything that happens is a result of something else.
But the good news is, that you can change your future by changing your way of thinking today and changing your actions today.
Similarly, you can reverse engineer things that have not gone as you wished and ask, “Why did that happen?”
You can do that now because you recognise that it wasn’t an accident.
So, if you’re unhappy with any part of your life, realize that you are where you are today because of all the things you’ve chosen to do, and the things you’ve chosen not to do.
Every decision you made, brought you to exactly where you are today.
Now, rather than taking this as a negative, look at the positive side.
What this means is every decision you make going forward will lead you somewhere else.
So the lesson from this is to stop treating your life like every just happens to start creating a new future by thinking differently and developing good habits.
There is a shortcut, get a good mentor who can see your blind spots and who can teach you different ways of thinking.
And hang around the right sort of people –successful people, positive people, and people who have already achieved what do you want to achieve.
By the way that’s exactly what happens to those people who join us at Wealth Retreat each year.
Join me for five transformative days on the Gold Coast from April 27th to May 1st and get the one-on-one private mentorship you need to achieve your most ambitious goals and dreams.
Not just in property, but in business and in life in general, because the aim of Wealth Retreat is to create Lifetime Wealth and leave a legacy.
When you join us you will get:
And if you would like to get the highest possible level of support for your most ambitious life and business goals, I encourage you to join me there!
Here’s your chance to take your property investment, career, or business to a much higher level – or change the script completely and set off on a new path that’s better aligned with your passion and purpose.
If you are interested in joining us, please express your interest here and have a qualification interview with me.
It is a unique opportunity – a very rare chance to work with a great team of mentors.
Wealth Retreat attracts an extremely high calibre of attendees.
These are people who are already successful and willing to take serious leaps in their careers, their personal lives, and the contributions they’re making in the world.
They’re the courageous few who dare to step out of the dominant culture of resignation and mediocrity and endeavour to create the life of their dreams.
Note: When you surround yourself with such motivated, energized, spiritually charged people, you tap into the power of the group and become more energized and powerful yourself.
There’s no limit to what you can accomplish with the support and encouragement of such incredible people!
Please note that to ensure the best possible experience, Wealth Retreat is limited to a small number of participants only.
Learn more and register your interest today.
I look forward to helping you perfect the life of your dreams!
]]>Each month the RBA summarises macroeconomic and financial market trends in Australia by providing a detailed chart pack.
Global ecomomic growth remains subdued, with major economies like the US and EU experiencing slower momentum due to high interest rates, persistent inflation, and tighter credit conditions and worries about Trump's tariffs.
The global economy is diverging, with the US showing stronger resilience, while Europe lags and emerging markets face currency volatility and tighter financial conditions.
Inflation pressures are easing, particularly in the US and Europe, but remain above central bank targets—fueling debate over how long rates need to stay elevated.
After one of the most aggressive global tightening cycles in decades, interest rates appear to have peaked in many parts of the world. Central banks across advanced economies had pushed rates sharply higher through 2022 and 2023 in a coordinated attempt to tame post-pandemic inflation. As a result, policy rates in the US, UK, Europe, and Australia all reached levels not seen in over a decade. However, in recent months, the narrative has shifted. Inflation is trending lower—albeit stubbornly—and growth is softening, prompting several central banks to signal that the hiking cycle is over.



This chart also shows our savings ratio has now dropped to below pre-pandemic levels as we keep spending our stashed cash to support our lifestyles.






While the property pessimists were making a fuss about low housing loan commitments, which are clearly a leading indicator of what's ahead for our property markets, the following chart shows that they have picked up recently and are well above long-term averages.
In particular, investor lending is up over 30% in the last 12 months. In other words, strategic investors are taking advantage of the current window of opportunity to get into the housing market.


In trend terms, in April 2025:








There are lots of ways to make money and there seems to be a group of property pessimists around at present.
Then there's the government who seem to tax investors wherever they can and give tenants more control.
Some people would argue that real estate investing isn't really that easy.
They complain that it takes time to develop the knowledge to understand the property market.
It can take months to research areas and find the right investment property.
Then when you've found it, you need to negotiate to get it at a favourable price.
And that's not all…

You will need to negotiate a loan and find a solicitor to settle the property.
This part alone will take 30 to 60 days.
Then, when you have settled the property, you still have to either find the time to manage it yourself or else try to find a reliable property manager.
Is this all starting to sound too complicated?
You are not alone – that's the very reason some people ignore property and choose to simply park their money in shares or managed funds.
But from personal experience, I know so many people who have become financially independent by investing in real estate and I know how real estate has grown my own asset base and changed my lifestyle, that my response is that property investment is well worth the effort.
Sure it takes time, but over the long term it pays off, and as your skills and experience grow it gets easier as well.
And, importantly, most investors find the process of building an investment property portfolio fun and the end result, if done correctly is...
1. Capital growth, which allows us to grow our net worth, and
2. Secure income, which increases over time.
As such, a residential property must be a key to your wealth-building program.
Let's look at the reasons to invest in property in more detail...

If you look at the results others have achieved, you have to say that property makes pretty good investment sense.
According to the AFR Rich 200 list, which is published each year, property has consistently been a major source of wealth for Australia's multimillionaires.
In fact it’s the same all over the world.
And those that haven't made their money out of property but maybe through businesses, generally invest their money in real estate.
Remember, there's nothing wrong with seeing what successful people do and applying those principles to your own life.
If the majority of extraordinarily wealthy people have used real estate profitably, it stands to reason that there’s money to be made in this sector.
Property investment is not just for the wealthy.
It doesn't really take large sums of money to get involved in real estate.
This is because banks will lend up to 95% and sometimes even 100% against the security of residential property, which means that most Australians with a steady job and a little capital behind them can afford to buy investment properties.
It has been shown over and over again that careful and intelligent use of real estate can enable ordinary Australians, like you and me, to become property millionaires in about 10 years.
If you truly intend to become one of wealthy people in the future, you should probably take a serious look at using property to your advantage.
It’s often said that residential real estate offers the security of "bricks and mortar", but let’s take a closer look at why I believe it's one of the safest and potentially most profitable investment markets in Australia.
You never hear of houses going broke, do you? But lots of companies have gone broke.
Even companies previously considered blue-chip companies have gone broke.
Yet even allowing for the ups and downs of real estate values that we hear about, the underlying trend of property prices in the major capital city residential markets has been steady growth.
You don't have to believe me when I say that residential property is a secure investment.
Just ask the banks.
Banks have always recognised property, and especially residential real estate, as excellent security.
The reason they'll generally lend you at least 80% of the value of your property is that they know property values have never fallen over the long term.
In fact, the entire Australian Banking system is underpinned by the continual growth of residential property.
Another factor contributing to the security of the residential property market is its size.
It has been estimated by CoreLogic that there are 11.3 million residential properties in Australia with a total value of about $11.1 trillion.
And the total outstanding mortgage against these properties is $2.3 trillion - in other words, the overall loan-to-value ratio of all the properties in Australia is less that 22%.
But the really special feature of the residential property market is that owner-occupiers, that is people owning or paying off their own homes, own about 70% of these properties.
Investors own the other 30%.
Think about it....residential property is the only investment market not dominated by investors, and this effectively gives investors a built-in safety net.
Even if all the investors were to leave the market at once, it would not totally collapse.
This 70% homeownership is a huge advantage for another reason- the majority of the market in which we invest does not act according to normal investment criteria or motivation.
If times get tough the majority of homeowners don’t panic and rush to sell as can happen in other sectors such as the share market.
So while property prices do fluctuate over time, affected by supply and demand, the large homeowner market will always underpin property values.
In fact, 56.3% of Australian household wealth is in housing.
Another factor that adds to the security of residential property as an investment is that you can insure it against most risks.
You can ensure the building against fire or damage and you can insure yourself against the tenant leaving and breaking a lease.
The rental income you receive from your investment property allows you to borrow and get the benefit of leverage by helping you pay the interest on your mortgage.
Will this continue in the future?
Over the years the rental income received from property investments has increased and in the last few years haas well outpaced inflation.
At the same time, statistics show that the level of homeownership is slowly decreasing in Australia.
It is predicted that the percentage of tenants will slowly increase.
There are a number of reasons for this but, in particular, as property prices keep rising, fewer people are able to afford their dream homes.
We know that the government is having difficulty providing public housing, which means there will be plenty of opportunities for landlords to make good money in residential property investment, particularly if you own a property that will be in demand by tenants of the future.
Good capital city residential property has an unequaled track record of producing high and consistent capital growth.
Over the past 45 years, the value of the average property in Melbourne and Sydney has doubled in value every 8 to 10 years or so.
However, in the short term, the picture is much more uncertain and confused and at times capital growth stops and even reverses for a time, as we saw in the early 90s and in the slump of 2003- 2006 as well as in 2022.
In all Australian capital cities, this growth has averaged just under 8%, compounding each year over the last 25 years.
These are just averages.
The better your property selection - where you buy, what you buy, how well you negotiate, and how you finance your property investment - the better your returns could be.
By the way, that's another great thing about the property.
You can outperform the average by researching areas of strong capital growth, by buying your properties below market value and then adding value, which increases your capital growth and rental return.
If a property increases in value by 10% per annum (averaged out over a number of years) then the value of that property doubles every seven years.
Imagine you owned a property worth $700,000.
In seven years' time, the same property would be worth $1.4 million and in 14 years it would be worth $2.8 million.
When you own that property worth $700,000 usually have some equity or your deposit and you borrow the rest. Imagine you had a 20% deposit and borrowed the balance ($560,000) from the bank.
After seven years you would still owe the bank $560,000 (assuming you had an interest-only loan) and your net worth would have increased from $140,000 to $840,000 (the value of the property $1.4 million dollars less your mortgage of $560,000.)
That's an increase in your net worth of six-fold even though the value of the property only doubled.
What would happen over the next seven years?
Your property would once again double in value to around $2.8 million and your net worth would increase to $2.2 million dollars.
Your initial $100,000 investment would have increased in value 16-fold while your property only increased in value four-fold.
This amazing increase in your net worth is due to the combined effects of compounding and leverage.
I will let you in on a little secret.
The return you get on real estate if you pay for your purchase using all cash (without getting a loan) isn't much higher than what you can achieve with other types of investments.
Of course, with real estate you usually don't pay using raw cash; instead, you use someone else's money to buy your properties.
That is, you put down a small deposit, often 20%, and the bank finances the rest.
This is called leverage.
Archimedes said, "Give me a lever and I'll move the earth."
As investors we don't want to move the earth, we just want to buy as much of it as we can!
The ability to use leverage with real estate significantly increases the amount of profit you can make and, importantly, it allows you to purchase a significantly larger investment than you would normally be able to.
Because of its history of security, stable income and proven capital growth, residential real estate is regarded as prime security or collateral for loans, which means that banks may lend you as high as 90% of the value of your property.
They won't lend this proportion to other types of investments.
If you buy shares in the banks themselves, the banks may only lend you 65% of the value of their own shares, and they only lend 70% or so of the value of commercial properties.
This makes the residential property an appealing vehicle for building wealth.
In the technical sense leveraging, or gearing as it is also known, means using a small effort to move a large object, like the gears on your bicycle where you have to pedal a small rotation to turn the large back wheel.
In the financial sense, leveraging is using a small amount of money to control a large asset.
You do this by borrowing money and mortgaging your property and using this borrowed money to invest in a larger asset.
The more highly you are geared, the more money you have borrowed, and the lower your invested capital in relation to your borrowings.
As you can see from the examples in the table above, the higher the degree of gearing, the more leverage you achieve, and the more your returns are magnified.
But be warned, gearing not only magnifies your profits, if the value of your investment falls, but your losses are also magnified as well.
Property is a great investment because you make all the decisions and have direct control over the returns from your property.
If your property is not producing good returns, then you can add value through refurbishment or renovations or adding furniture to make it more desirable to tenants.
In other words, you can directly influence your returns by taking an interest in your property and by understanding and then meeting the needs of prospective tenants.
These are so important that we have a number of different articles on this in series, so we'll skip over-explaining them here.
There are hundreds of ways you can add value to your property, which will increase your income and your property's capital value.
These include little things like giving it a coat of paint or removing the old carpet and polishing the floorboards underneath.
Or you could do major renovations or development works.
Unlike most other investments, when real estate goes up in value you don’t need to sell in order to capitalise on that increased value.
You simply go back to your bank or mortgage broker and get your lender to increase your loan.
Even if you bought the worst house at the worst possible time, the chances are good that it would still go up in value over the next few years.
History has proven that real estate is possibly the most forgiving investment asset over time.
If you are prepared to hold property over a number of years, it's bound to rise in value.
There's really no other asset class quite like property!
Note: So while the property markets will create significant wealth for many Australians, statistics show that 50% of those who buy an investment property sell up in the first five years.
And of those who stay in the investment game, 92% never get past their first or second property.
That's because attaining wealth doesn’t just happen, it’s the result of a well-executed plan.
Planning is bringing the future into the present so you can do something about it now!
Just to make things clear...buying an investment property is NOT a strategy!
It's important to start with the end game in mind and understand what you need and what you want to achieve.
And then you have to build a plan, a strategy to get there.
The property you eventually buy will be the physical manifestation of a whole lot of decisions that you will make, and they must be made in the right order
That's because property investment is a process, not an event.
If you’re a beginner looking for a time-tested property investment strategy or an established investor who’s stuck or maybe you just want an objective second opinion about your situation, I suggest you allow the team at Metropole to build you a personalised, customised Strategic Property Plan.
When you have a Strategic Property Plan you’re more likely to achieve the financial freedom you desire because we’ll help you:
And the real benefit is you’ll be able to grow your wealth through your property portfolio faster and more safely than the average investor.
Click here now and learn more about this service and discuss your options with us.
Your Strategic Property Plan should contain the following components:
The campaign ads are off the air, the polling booths are packed away, and the headlines have moved on to the next big story.
But make no mistake — What happened at the ballot box is going to shape our property markets for years to come.
In this episode of the Michael Yardney Podcast, Simon Kuestenmacher, Brett Warren and I are going to unpack exactly what the recent election results mean for you as a property investor, homeowner, or aspiring buyer
]]>
We choose to rent or own homes in particular suburbs because it's close to where we work, it may have an exciting entertainment scene, or perhaps it's in the right school zone for our children.
But does that mean that you should invest in your own backyard, too?
The thing is, far too many beginning investors do just that when they start out.
Their thinking is: Well, I love this suburb so everyone else will as well!
But this isn't necessarily true and here are some reasons why...

You’re likely to invest in your own backyard because you're biased towards it.
Confirmation bias is the natural human tendency to seek or emphasise information that is confirmatory of an existing conclusion or hypothesis.
But in my view, confirmation bias is a major reason for investment mistakes…
In order to minimise the risk of confirmation bias, we attempt to challenge the status quo and seek information that causes us to question our investment thesis.
Make sure you check multiple information sources to ensure that the conclusion you’ve reached is truly correct (and is not just the information supporting your personal belief).
In many cases, where you want to live geographically and what type of property you want to live in may not be a great choice for a long-term investment property.
That's often because your home suburb has been chosen for emotional reasons and we all know that investing should be about using your head and not your heart.
Strategic investors know to dig deeper than the average investor.
They are always on the lookout for investment-grade properties that are going to outperform the averages – and that will probably mean investing in locations other than their home suburb.
In fact, smart investors often look in other states when searching for their next property.
The property investment system that has helped me build a very substantial property portfolio and that we recommend to all our clients at Metropole uses what we call a top-down approach.
Hybrid work practices are here to stay meaning more of us will be working from home at least part time.
This means gone are the days where our ‘home’ was simply the place we rest our heads and enjoy some downtime between work and our social lives – the coronavirus social distancing has put an end to life as we once knew it.
If social distancing and the Covid-19 environment have taught us anything, it has taught us the importance of the neighbourhood we live in.
If you can leave your home and be in walking distance of, or a short trip to, a great shopping strip, your favourite coffee shop, amenities, the beach, or a great park, the recently implemented coronavirus restrictions might seem a little more palatable than if you had none of that on your doorstep.
That’s why choosing the right neighbourhood is important for property investors.
In short, it’s all to do with capital growth, and we all know capital growth is critical for investment success, or just to create more stored wealth in the value of your home.
But these are off’s and won’t make a long-term difference if your property is not in the right location because you can’t change its location.
This is key because we know that 80% of a property’s performance is dependent on the location and its neighbourhood.
In fact, some locations have even outperformed others by 50-100% over the past decade.
And it’s likely that moving forward, thanks to the current environment, people will place a greater emphasis on neighbourhood and inner and middle-ring suburbs where more affluent occupants and tenants will be living.
These ‘liveable’ neighbourhoods with close amenities is where capital growth will outperform.
Hopefully, by now you can see that investing in your own backyard is usually not the best investment strategy.
That's because there are many other locations across Australia that can provide investors with opportunities to buy a property with better chances of achieving above-average capital growth in the years ahead.
While successful investing is all about strategy, it is also about considering all options and owning a geographically diverse portfolio so you can make the most of market "ups" and protect yourself during any "downs".
That way, market conditions are almost irrelevant because there is always somewhere in a country of our size where opportunities are ripe for investment picking.
]]>Like you're playing Monopoly but your opponent passed “Go” decades before you were even dealt your first card?
That feeling is real.
And if you’re a Millennial or Gen Z, it’s probably more than just a hunch — data backs it.
In this episode of Demographics Decoded, Simon Kuestenmacher and I explored whether Baby Boomers really had it easier, how the game has changed, and what younger Australians can do to adapt, invest, and still build wealth in today’s environment.

For weekly insights and strategic advice, subscribe to the Demographics Decoded podcast, where we will continue to explore these trends and their implications in greater detail.
Subscribe now on your favourite Podcast player:
Let’s start with the data.
According to the HILDA survey — a longitudinal study tracking income, employment, housing and family dynamics — Baby Boomers currently own 54% of all dwellings in Australia, while making up just 26% of households.
That’s not just a disproportionate share, it’s a structural shift in wealth.
Boomer households, on average, are worth over $1 million, while Millennials sit just above $500,000.
That’s a 2x gap, and while part of that reflects the simple mechanics of compounding and time, Simon rightly pointed out that this gap is larger than expected and reveals a deeper imbalance.
And that’s before you account for debt.
Boomers have significantly reduced their liabilities, while younger generations are more leveraged than ever, carrying not just mortgage debt, but HECS debt, consumer credit, and higher living costs across the board.
Here’s the nuance that often gets lost in the debate.
As a Boomer myself, I can confidently say that we worked hard, lived frugally, and took risks.
Buying property in the 70s and 80s wasn’t stress-free.
Banks wouldn’t even consider a wife's income when assessing loans.
Interest rates hit double digits.
The concept of dual-income borrowing didn’t exist until later.
But what we did have were structural tailwinds:
These factors made it easier to build wealth through property, provided you were disciplined and committed for the long haul.
Simon made a sharp observation: Millennials aren’t just facing a tougher financial environment, but they’re also managing higher expectations.
Baby Boomers started families in their early to mid-20s. Today, people are doing that a decade later.
That means:
This isn’t entitlement, it’s evolution.
It’s not realistic to tell people to “lower their standards” when those standards are now embedded in societal expectations.
And with urban density increasing, land is scarcer, construction is more expensive (thanks to higher standards, better materials, and labour shortages), and we haven’t built any new major cities to spread the load.
That puts even more pressure on prices.
Often overlooked in these conversations is Generation X — the current “sandwich generation” aged 40–59.
These Australians are:
As Simon put it, “they’re being squeezed from both ends.”
The good news?
In about a decade, the financial pressure may ease as their children become independent and their parents pass on.
But right now, the squeeze is real, and many won’t be able to afford that final property upgrade they’d hoped for.
Enter the Bank of Mum and Dad — the fifth-largest lender in the country.
With an estimated $4 to $6 trillion in wealth set to be transferred intergenerationally over the next 15 years, many Baby Boomers are choosing to pass on wealth “with a warm hand”, helping children or grandchildren with deposits or home purchases.
Simon made a key point here: if parents give a child $100,000, that could save them over $200,000 in long-term mortgage interest.
It’s not just a gift, it’s leverage.
But this trend is also creating a widening divide between asset-rich families who can help their children and those who can’t.
And that, over time, becomes a systemic inequality where property ownership becomes the key determinant of wealth and opportunity.

Given the challenges of buying where you live, a growing number of younger Australians are embracing rentvesting — renting in the lifestyle location they want while investing in a more affordable area.
This strategy allows:
As more apartments come onto the market and regional areas grow, we’re likely to see this become an increasingly common strategy, especially for first-time investors who are priced out of their desired owner-occupier locations.
Simon offered a clear policy message: scrap first home buyer grants.
They sound helpful.
But in reality, they simply pour fuel on the fire, pushing prices up by inflating demand without addressing the real problem: a chronic shortage of supply.
We need bolder reform:
If we want to reduce long-term poverty, reduce wealth inequality, and preserve social trust in our system, housing must be treated as infrastructure, not just a financial asset.
Yes, Boomers got a head start.
Yes, the rules have changed.
But younger Australians have something money can’t buy: time.
Time to:
The earlier you begin, the more options you have.
It’s not about “timing the market.”
It’s about time in the market.
Every generation faces its own set of challenges.
Boomers didn’t have it “easy,” but they had structural advantages.
Millennials and Gen Z face headwinds, but also have tools, information, and strategic support that didn’t exist 40 years ago.
The key is not to wish for different rules, but to learn how to play smarter within the current ones.
If you missed out on passing Go in the 80s or 90s, that doesn’t mean you can’t still build wealth today.
It just means you need a different strategy.
The good news?
You’ve got time, and if you play it right, that’s the most powerful asset of all.
If you found this discussion helpful, don't forget to subscribe to our podcast and share it with others who might benefit.
Subscribe now on your favourite Podcast player:
]]>